Compartir
NATO-Warsaw Pact: Assessment of the Conventional Force Balance: Nsiad-89-23 (en Inglés)
U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor)
·
Bibliogov
· Tapa Blanda
NATO-Warsaw Pact: Assessment of the Conventional Force Balance: Nsiad-89-23 (en Inglés) - U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
$ 13.26
$ 15.75
Ahorras: $ 2.49
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis ListasSe enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Lunes 29 de Julio y el
Martes 30 de Julio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Estados Unidos entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "NATO-Warsaw Pact: Assessment of the Conventional Force Balance: Nsiad-89-23 (en Inglés)"
GAO reviewed the Conventional Defense Study Group's report to Congress on the balance of conventional forces between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Warsaw Pact. GAO reviewed experts' views of U.S. perspectives on the balance of conventional forces in Central Europe and found that: (1) experts believe that NATO conventional capabilities have improved over the last decade, and its peacetime deterrent position is good; (2) participants generally believed that Warsaw Pact forces might not have a substantial manpower advantage in a short-preparation or medium-warning attack due to a lack of sufficient forward-based forces; and (3) participants expressed concern about NATO ability to sustain a protracted conventional conflict because of inadequate logistics and limited stock levels. In addition, GAO reviewed experts' views of Soviet Union perspectives and found that: (1) although the Soviets probably believed that they had a marginal advantage in the conventional balance, the Soviets expressed concern over the effect of NATO technological and systems development; (2) Soviet analyses emphasized defense-offense and system-to-system comparisons, rather than weapon-for-weapon comparisons; (3) the Soviets believed that NATO lacked effective strategic leadership with respect to reinforcement and resupply, and opportunity to exercise operational command; and (4) the Soviets probably believed that they could achieve military success even given overall force parity because of the superiority of certain aspects of Soviet military doctrine. GAO also found that experts believe that: (1) NATO needs to improve its conventional capabilities; and (2) European nations need to assume greater responsibility for their defense.
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
- 0% (0)
Todos los libros de nuestro catálogo son Originales.
El libro está escrito en Inglés.
La encuadernación de esta edición es Tapa Blanda.
✓ Producto agregado correctamente al carro, Ir a Pagar.
